Talk:RS-485
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the RS-485 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the DH 485 page were merged into RS-485 on 2016-06-22. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Merge request
[edit]I'm requesting that this article have its history merged into EIA-485, where this article now is. (Someone else has improperly cut-and-pasted the article instead of moving it.) I made the request on the Helpdesk but got no response. –radiojon 02:00, 2005 Jan 31 (UTC)
Huh?
[edit]This seems like a nonsense sentence ... "between the ribbon cable?
This allows EIA-485 to implement linear topologies using only two lines and between the ribbon cable.
2-Wire and 4-Wire Implementations
[edit]Might be good to discuss the differences of a 2-wire (half-duplex) over a 4-wire (full-duplex) implementation. This seems to have become an increasingly popular marketing point with various vendors.
More polarity confusion
[edit]The diagram labels the two signals U+ and U-. I have added a caption and updated the text in the section to clarify that U- = A and U+ = B. If someone wants to update the diagram replacing U- and U+ with A and B respectively so we have consistent signal descriptions in the article, that would be good.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f2/RS-485_waveform.svg/487px-RS-485_waveform.svg.png)
Before correcting me on this, please read previous discussion above and RS-485#Signals. ~Kvng (talk) 17:22, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Kvng. I believe that the section RS-485#Signals is actually incorrect. If you are available to discuss I am happy to do so. My logic is as follows:
- Understanding that a microcontroller UART outputs a logic 1 when 'idle' (mark), and a start bit is a logic 0.
- ON THE WIRE, the sense of 1 and 0 is reversed. i.e. "UART Logic 1" == "Idle" == "Mark" == "ON" == "Binary 0 'on-the-wire'"
- Therefore in the diagram U+ should be marked A, and not B as you proposed.
- Closest reference, without buying the TIA-485 specification, is this TI document that has an excerpt of the TIA-485 specification — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edward Hague (talk • contribs) 14:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Polarity per RS485 IC manufactures
[edit]My guess of why RS485 IC manufactures describes "A" to be positive because that side is pulled up by a bias resistor, and "B" to be negative because that side is pulled down by a bias resistor. Its the bias resistor pull direction, not the polarity of the data bit.
Bias Resistors (if exist):
- in the following, the "+" pins are pulled up.
- in the following, the "-" pins are pulled down.
The following is what I use in the custom symbols in my schematics. See page 10 of XR33052 datasheet.
RS485 ICs: (the dual letters come from the above datasheet and the merging of the letters from two RS422 buses)
- +A/Y = pin6 of 8pin RS485 ICs
- -B/Z = pin7 of 8pin RS485 ICs
RS422 ICs:
- +A = receiver pin
- -B = receiver pin
- +Y = transmitter pin
- -Z = transmitter pin
- C-Class Computing articles
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- C-Class Computer networking articles
- Mid-importance Computer networking articles
- C-Class Computer networking articles of Mid-importance
- All Computer networking articles
- All Computing articles
- C-Class electronic articles
- Mid-importance electronic articles
- WikiProject Electronics articles